
A young man returns from abroad to win his beloved, only to find his own father meddling in city affairs and attempting to secure a young bride for himself.
In Short
This play is a satirical comedy from the early years of the American republic. It follows the return of a young man named Charles Loveyet to his native city, where he finds his father, Old Loveyet, embroiled in both romantic delusions and heated political arguments regarding the new Constitution. The work serves as a window into the tensions of 1789, contrasting the earnestness of young love with the pomposity of aging, opinionated men. It has lasted as a curious, rare specimen of the American dramatic voice during the transition into a new national identity.
The Story
The narrative centers on Charles Loveyet’s return from the West Indies to his home, where he hopes to marry the virtuous Harriet Trueman. Upon his arrival, he discovers his father, Old Loveyet, is a man obsessed with politics and convinced of his own youthful vitality. Old Loveyet, a fierce critic of the new Constitution, is simultaneously feuding with Harriet’s father, Trueman, a schoolmaster who speaks in a mix of Latin and high-flown rhetoric.
Old Loveyet’s vanity is his undoing. He believes himself desirable to women half his age and becomes convinced that his son’s rival, a coxcomb named Worthnought, is merely an insignificant nuisance. While Charles navigates the city, he uses disguises and clever deceptions to maneuver around his father’s interference. Meanwhile, Old Loveyet sets his sights on a woman named Maria, convinced she shares his political fervor and romantic interest, only to be humiliated by his own self-delusion.
The conflict reaches its peak when Old Loveyet manages to alienate everyone around him through his volatile temper and irrational insistence on his "good Constitution"—a term he uses to describe both his physical health and his political alignment. As Worthnought attempts to push his own suit for Harriet, he is exposed as a coward. Charles, meanwhile, plays on his father’s pride and confusion, eventually revealing his true identity after having successfully secured Harriet’s hand in marriage.
The climax occurs when Old Loveyet confronts the group, hoping to find validation for his romantic pursuits. Instead, Maria explicitly rejects him, mocking his dotage and conceit. Old Loveyet, realizing he has been tricked by his son and outmaneuvered by the younger generation, falls into a fit of rage. He decries the "perfidious" nature of the youth and his own loss of influence. Ultimately, the play concludes with the young couples united. Charles expresses a poignant, if slightly melancholy, wish to reconcile with his father, acknowledging that while his own happiness is secure, it has come at the cost of the older man’s dignity. The play ends on a note of triumph for the young lovers, who effectively declare that the vitality of personal affection will always outlast the rigid, bickering politics of the previous generation.
How It Unfolds
A return to native soil Charles arrives in the city and immediately meets his friend Frankton, lamenting the complications awaiting him. He learns that his beloved Harriet is being pestered by the foppish Worthnought, who mistakes her politeness for genuine affection.
The clash of constitutions Old Loveyet and the schoolmaster Trueman engage in a series of heated arguments that blur the line between physical health and national politics. The two men bicker incessantly, with Trueman using Latin to mock the older man’s vanity and ignorance.
Deception in the city Charles maneuvers through the social scene, employing subtle deceptions to keep his father occupied. He maintains a playful distance from his father, who remains oblivious to the fact that his son is already back and actively undermining his schemes.
The final unmasking The various subplots collide at the climax, where Old Loveyet’s romantic hopes are shattered by Maria’s blunt rejection. Charles reveals his identity to his father, who is left to rant against the loss of his control and the triumph of the younger generation.
The People
Charles Loveyet is the romantic lead, a man of wit who uses his intelligence to navigate around his father’s obstacles. He wants to marry Harriet and remains devoted to her throughout his deceptions.
Old Loveyet is the central antagonist of his own life, a man of forty-two who acts as though he is still in his prime. He is defined by his vanity, his obsession with the Constitution, and his volatile temper. He ends the story humiliated and alone.
Harriet Trueman is the object of Charles's affection, known for her beauty and refined education. She is sharp-witted and guarded, often using her understanding of character to keep the foolish Worthnought at bay.
Trueman is Harriet’s father, a pedantic schoolmaster who loves to flaunt his learning. He is an essential foil to Old Loveyet, providing a constant source of friction that drives the play’s comic momentum.
Worthnought is the "coxcomb," a superficial, vain man who believes himself a lady’s man. He is revealed to be a coward and a fool, providing a clear contrast to Charles’s genuine sincerity.
In Its Own Voice
"Spelling as in the original has been preserved."
This note serves as the editor’s warning that the reader will encounter period-specific orthography and grammatical structures throughout the text.
"To front the battle, and to fear no harm, / The shield must glitter on the warrior's arm: / Let such dull prudence their designs attend, / But Love, unaided, shall obtain its end!"
Charles recites these lines to justify his decision to move forward with his plans to win Harriet, prioritizing his romantic pursuit over the cautious advice of others.
"His rage, resentment, av'rice, dotage, pride, / (Sad view of human nature's frailest side!) / Shall mend us all;--but chiefly I shall prove, / That all his Politics, can never match my LOVE."
These lines conclude the play, summarizing the victory of the younger generation's personal desires over the older man's political and personal obsession.
What It's Really About
The central argument concerns the inevitable generational shift in a new republic. The play asks whether the rigid, often hypocritical "political" obsessions of the older generation can survive the honest, individualistic spirit of the young. It contrasts "musty" Latinate learning and outdated social codes with a more modern, feeling-based approach to life. The "politician" of the title is out-witted not because he lacks intelligence, but because he is blinded by self-importance. Ultimately, the work suggests that while politics provides a framework for society, it is the fundamental human impulse toward love and personal connection that truly drives the future, rendering the bluster of aging ideologues increasingly irrelevant and, eventually, a source of comedy rather than power.
Why Read It Today
Readers who enjoy the history of early American literature or the specific, often prickly tone of 18th-century social comedies will find this work fascinating. It reads like a snapshot of a moment when the United States was still trying to define itself, both in its halls of power and in its private parlors. You will encounter a cadence of speech that is theatrical and heightened, filled with insults like "illiterate lubber" and "coxcomb," which may feel alien yet charming to a modern ear.
The challenges are clear: the text features a dense, rhythmic style and period-specific biases that may require some patience to parse. The dialogue is sometimes intentionally difficult, as characters use Latin or "outlandish" phrasing to confuse one another. However, the experience of reading this is like walking through a museum of language. You get a sense of how people in 1789 imagined the conflict between the "old" world—represented by the aging, bickering, and politically obsessed—and the "new" world of the young lovers who, while not perfect, at least possess a degree of self-awareness. It is a slim, sharp look at the absurdity of human vanity that, despite its age, feels surprisingly recognizable in its depiction of how easily we let our opinions turn us into caricatures.
This summary was written by AI (gemini-3.1-flash-lite) on 2026-08-31 and is a guide to the book, not a replacement for it — it can be incomplete or wrong. The book itself is public domain. Copyright & AI disclosure · Report a problem





